Your US ERP almost certainly cannot issue a legal Mexican invoice. And the decision that determines whether a system can is not the brand — it is the edition and hosting tier you buy. Get that wrong and the fix is expensive.
In Mexico an ERP has to sign every invoice with your certificate, send it to an authorized provider for validation, and store the returned XML. On top of that it must produce a monthly third-party transaction report and electronic accounting files in government formats.
Most US-centric systems either cannot do this at all, or do it through a third-party add-on you will maintain forever. And among the systems that do support Mexico, the capability frequently sits in a higher-priced edition than the one you were quoted.
Do you invoice large retail chains or automotive OEMs? They require an addenda — their own XML block inside your invoice. Supporting one means installing custom code, which several cloud tiers flatly do not allow. Ask this before you sign, not after.
If invoicing needs a third-party module, that is a permanent maintenance line item, not a one-time cost.
Most systems integrate a short list of authorized providers. If yours is not on it, you are writing a connector.
Addendas and industry-specific complements are modules. Some hosting tiers do not accept any.
License is the small number. Implementation, catalog mapping and payroll add-ons are the real budget.
We implement Odoo and SAP, so we have no reason to push you toward either. The detailed edition-by-edition comparison lives on our Odoo versions guide.
We publish our implementation packages rather than making you sit through a discovery call to hear a number. For a US company standing up a Mexican entity, the middle package is usually the fit: it includes full CFDI 4.0 invoicing, the payment complement, the third-party report and electronic accounting.
Sales, purchasing and inventory for one business line. 2-3 weeks. No tax module.
Everything above plus CFDI 4.0 with your provider, payment complement, DIOT and electronic accounting. 4-6 weeks.
Adds point of sale with global invoicing and e-commerce. 6-8 weeks.
The software license is paid directly to the vendor at their public list price — we do not resell it or mark it up. Full breakdown on our pricing page.
Detailed guides on our Mexico site, written by the same engineers who would run your project.
What a Mexican invoice legally requires, and what your company needs before invoice #1.
Entity, talent, time zone and cost — the practical playbook for US teams.
Why the free edition cannot stamp invoices, and when paying for the licensed one pays off.
The hosting decision that determines whether you can support addendas at all.
Already on SAP? The three honest paths for a Mexican subsidiary, compared.
Sometimes, through a third-party compliance add-on. It works, but you inherit a permanent dependency on that vendor and their release cycle. For a small Mexican entity, a local ERP that stamps natively is usually simpler and cheaper to own.
For a Mexican subsidiary, yes — it handles CFDI 4.0, the payment complement and electronic accounting natively in its licensed edition. We run our own company on it. For a large multinational already standardized on SAP, keeping SAP and adding the Mexican localization usually wins. We implement both.
Four to six weeks is realistic for a clean setup, and the constraint is usually your certificate and provider paperwork rather than the software.
Yes. We are based in Monterrey with an entity in Texas, we work Central Time and our team is bilingual. That is the whole point of nearshore.
You do, entirely, with the repository and documentation. No black boxes and no lock-in.
Free assessment with the team that runs its own Mexican ERP. You leave with scope, timeline and a number in writing — even if you decide to build it elsewhere.